Message #2452
From: Melinda Green <melinda@superliminal.com>
Subject: Re: [MC4D] MagicTile Solving
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:52:26 -0700
Ah, I missed the ‘6’, thank you for the correction. This is one of the 3
IRPs that are as perfectly symmetric as the Platonic solids in every
way. It is also the IRP twin of the original Rubik’s cube. I would still
like to know why Nan’s solution is so much shorter.
I also do not understand why you see the IRP 4-5 b30 f001 as a warm-up
exercise to the IRP {4,5} a30 F 0:0:1. True they both have 30 colors and
genus 4, but they have different symmetries which I would guess would
make the ‘a’ puzzle the simpler of the two.
-Melinda
On 11/2/2012 2:05 PM, Eduard Baumann wrote:
>
>
> Wait.
> The similar puzzle I mentioned is
> NOT
> MT irp {4,5} a30 F 0:0:1
> BUT
> MT irp {4,6} 12 F 0:0:1
> I will attack
> MT irp {4,5} a30 F 0:0:1
> next time but I wanted study before he color topology of a30 and b30.
> Ed
>
> —– Original Message —–
> *From:* Melinda Green <mailto:melinda@superliminal.com>
> *To:* 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com <mailto:4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2012 9:53 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [MC4D] MagicTile Solving
>
> {4,5} a30 is one of my favorite IRPs. I find it to be quite beautiful and symmetric. It is the one that I showcase on themain geometry page <http://superliminal.com/geometry/geometry.htm> to introduce the subject. (Third image down.) The ‘b’ puzzle that surprised you is less symmetric but is still a fascinating structure. It looks very much like an apartment complex. I would like to know why Nan was able to solve it with such a smaller number of twists. Unless your macros are extremely long, it doesn’t seem like that can be the only difference. What do you think, Nan?
>
> -Melinda
>
> On 11/2/2012 11:17 AM, Eduard wrote:
>> Solving of MT irp {4,5} b30 F 0:0:1 —– || 11/02/2012 || 2393
>>
>> Remark:
>> Over 2000 twists. I worked without macros this time. Not low hanging fruit. Here 30 colors. In the similar puzzle "irp 4-6 12 f001" with 12 colors I worked with macros and needed 21’000 twists (Nan only 400 !!).
>
>
>
>
>