Message #4052
From: Ed Ussery <metamind@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Physical 2x2x2x2 HOF
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 14:55:27 -0700
Hi Melinda,
I just sent you the $99. I tried to do the "Friends and Family" option, but I don’t think myaccount was set up for that until after I made the payment. Sorry about that. I don’t usePayPal often.
Peace and Success,
Ed
—–Original Message—–
From: "Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com [4D_Cubing]" <4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Jun 24, 2018 7:52 PM
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Physical 2x2x2x2 HOF
  
  
    Aw, gee thanks, Ed. I think you’re awesome too!
I'll still sell to list members for $99 including shipping, and I'll<br>
keep it up for as long as I can. You and everyone else on the list<br>
can just order through PayPal here. In the<br>
notes, please include: 
<br> Your name and address in the notes with the way you would like<br>
    it labeled. <br> Whether you prefer it to be signed & numbered or just<br>
    clean. <br> Optionally include a phone number for the shipper.
I'd also appreciate it if you use the friends-and-family option so<br>
that I'll get the full amount, but that will give up some buyer<br>
protections, so that's entirely your choice.  Sometimes we can ship<br>
immediately. Other times it can take 2-6 weeks.
Happy puzzling!
-Melinda
On 6/24/2018 7:27 PM, Ed Ussery<br>
  metamind@earthlink.net [4D_Cubing] wrote:
Hello Melinda,
I’ve been loosely following the discussion and developments
          of the physical 2x2x2x2.
I’m interested in acquiring one pre-fabricated. It looks
          like it
will take too much time for me to build one myself.
What’s the price?
(You’re amazing, by the way!)
Ed
    <br> -----Original<br>
      Message-----<br>
      
      From: "Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com [4D_Cubing]"<br>
      <4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com><br>
      
      Sent: Jun 21, 2018 4:09 PM<br>
      
      To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com<br>
      
      Subject: Re: [MC4D] Physical 2x2x2x2 HOF<br>
 
Hello Marc,
                      Good point about rule sets. Solution notes<br>
                      makes sense but I don't want to tarnish<br>
                      anyone's accomplishment. I decided to be much<br>
                      more liberal about this than I am for MC4D,<br>
                      especially for past solutions. In those cases<br>
                      I'm pretty much just deciding whether the<br>
                      person appears to have demonstrated the<br>
                      ability to solve the puzzle. I encourage those<br>
                      people to produce a new or updated video using<br>
                      the canonical set but I don't want to require<br>
                      that.
                      
                      I really want to add your name to the list<br>
                      too. We're now up to 6, so if you want to get<br>
                      in the first 10, you should probably get<br>
                      moving! :-)
                      
                      Happy puzzling!
                      -Melinda
                      
                    <br> On 6/21/2018 10:17<br>
                      AM, Marc Ringuette ringuette@solarmirror.com<br>
                      [4D_Cubing] wrote:
                    
                      Hi, Melinda,
                      
                      Good idea to start the HOF list.   It's worth<br>
                      noting that there are a variety of rule sets,<br>
                      and associated details, being used in the<br>
                      first four solutions on the list (I'm not<br>
                      familiar with the 5th, Joseph's).   
                      
                      Because our rule sets are still in flux, and<br>
                      because I think they should STAY in flux for<br>
                      quite a while ... I suggest adding a "notes"<br>
                      field to the HOF list, to describe what kind<br>
                      of solution it was.
                      
                      Here are the notes I'd personally attach to<br>
                      the first four solutions on the HOF list.
                      
                      Bob's:  strict rules, well described, no video
                      Zander's:  parity violating 4-cycles used,<br>
                      full video
                      Luna's:  strict rules, full video
                      Chris's:  poor scramble, semi-strict rules,<br>
                      4-cycle shortcuts used with parity correction,<br>
                      has video
                      
                      
                      Cheers
                      Marc
                      
                      
                      
                      On 6/20/2018 9:12<br>
                        PM, Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com<br>
                        [4D_Cubing] wrote:
Just a quick note to let you know that
                                I’ve created a HOF for the
                                  physical 2^4. All feedback
                                welcome. If any of you besides Zander
                                and Luna have solved it, I’d love to add
                                you to the list. We’re currently up to
                                solver #5, so if you want to get
                                yourself into the first 10, it would be
                                good to do that soon as we’ve already
                                shipped over 30 puzzles! The
                                Can-Chris-Solve videos resulted in at
                                least 10 sales, and he plans to launch a
                                final video on Saturday in which he
                                fixes his pop and properly finishes his
                                solve.
                            -Melinda
_