Message #2325

From: schuma <mananself@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hyperbolic Honeycomb {7,3,3}
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:06:48 -0000

Hi all,

I’m glad that my applet initiated so much discussion. Thank you all. I’ve been attending a conference recently, and has got no time to read it. I’ll try to catch up once I finish what I’m working on, and then maybe turn some of our discussion into illustrations.

Nan

— In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Andrey" <andreyastrelin@…> wrote:
>
> — In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, Roice Nelson <roice3@> wrote:
> >
> > None of the solutions have simple looking numbers though. I was also
> > disappointed to see that for {3,3,r}, no integer r works with the
> > {3,ultrainf} based on the {6,4}. Now I’m left wondering if there is a
> > better canonical {3,ultrainf}, which can be justified as "the best" in some
> > other way.
> >
> > Roice
> >
> I think that for H2 {3,ultrainf} based on the {6,4} is good, and in H3 the best ultrainfinite {3,3} is a cell of {3,3,8} - it has almost uniform truncated form.
>
> Andrey
>